Zorba is
the foundation and Buddha is the palace. Buddha is the peak, but the foundation
stones are laid by Zorba. It will be foolish to choose to be a Buddha without
having the foundation stones.
“I am
absolutely mathematical about it: Zorba should be there and the stronger a
Zorba is there, the better a Buddha is possible. So I can become Buddha any
moment, Zorba is absolutely needed as the basic energy out of which the Buddha
is going to be carved. Zorba is the marble rock out of which the Buddha statue
has to be carved. I choose the rock...and Buddha is easy.
“It is just a
question of opening your eyes. I don’t bother about Buddha; I am worried about
people who are not Zorbas. How will they become Buddhas? They don’t have the
basic material out of which a Buddha is made.
“And this
poverty has been given to people by our religious leaders. They have been told
not to be materialists. They have been told to be celibate. They have been told
to live in poverty. They have been told that life is out of sin. All these
things have destroyed their Zorbas. Otherwise, every man is a born Zorba the
Greek.
“And if
everything goes according to me, every man will die as Zorba the Buddha.
Between the Greek and the Buddha there is not much distance, but first you must
be the Greek.”
I Have
Called That the New Man — Zorba the Buddha
“First I
taught you about trust, the heart, feeling, love; and now I am teaching you
about doubt, skepticism, reason, intellect, because I would like you to be a
whole man. You can be completely satisfied with trusting, with the heart, but
you will not be a whole man. I would not call Mira a whole person, I would not
call Ramakrishna a whole person. They are beautiful, but the intellect is
missing; it is all heart. It is too much sugar, it creates diabetes. I am
diabetic. Too much of the heart, too much sweetness, and you suffer from
diabetes — and I don’t want any of you to suffer from diabetes. Yes, just
living by the heart you will have spiritual diabetes. Intellect is salty,
spicy; it is not all sugar.
“I would
like you to enjoy the wholeness of your being, when your body, your heart, your
intellect all fall in tune. I have called that the new man — Zorba the Buddha.”
Nothing to
Choose, Nothing to Discard
Koji wrote:
Nothing to
choose, nothing to discard.
“That’s
what I mean by Zorba the Buddha: nothing to choose.
“Buddha had
chosen: he had chosen to escape from the world, he had chosen to leave his wife
and child and old father, he had chosen to run away instead of encountering the
world and facing the reality. It was a clear-cut choice against the world,
against the material, in favor of the spiritual.
“A man of
totality has nothing to choose. His life is a life of choicelessness. Nothing
to choose, nothing to discard; they are two sides of the same coin. If you
choose something, you will have to discard something.”
Zorba Is
Only the Beginning
“I would
like this man Zorba to be alive in everybody, because it is your natural
inheritance.
But you
should not stop at Zorba.
Zorba is
only the beginning. Sooner or later, if you allow your Zorba full expression,
you are bound to think of something better, higher, greater. It will not come
out of thinking; it will come out of your experiences — because those small
experiences will become boring.
Buddha
himself had come to be Buddha because he had lived the life of a Zorba.”
Silence
Will Become a Song
“The Zorba
loves singing, playing on his musical instruments, dancing. Buddha will make it
perfect, absolute. Even silence will become a song, even stones will become
sermons, and whatever you touch will become a musical instrument because your
hands will now have the magic of the whole existence; they will have the grace,
the beauty, the poetry...”
Question -
Beloved Master, How is your Rebel concerned with "Zorba The Buddha"?
Osho -
Maneesha, my rebel, my new man, is Zorba the Buddha. Mankind has lived
believing either in the reality of the soul and the illusoriness of matter, or
in the reality of matter and the illusoriness of the soul. You can divide the
humanity of the past into the spiritualists and the materialists. But nobody
has bothered to look at the reality of man. He is both together. He is neither
just spirituality -- he is not just consciousness -- nor is he just matter. He
is a tremendous harmony between matter and consciousness.
Or perhaps
matter and consciousness are not two things, but only two aspects of one
reality: matter is the outside of consciousness, and consciousness is the
interiority of matter. But there has not been a single philosopher, sage, or
religious mystic in the past who has declared this unity; they were all in
favor of dividing man, calling one side real and the other side unreal. This
has created an atmosphere of schizophrenia all over the earth.
You cannot
live just as a body. That's what Jesus means when he says, "Man cannot
live by bread alone" -- but this is only half the truth. You cannot live
just as consciousness alone, you cannot live without bread either. You have two
dimensions of your being, and both the dimensions have to be fulfilled, given
equal opportunity for growth. But the past has been either in favor of one and
against the other, or in favor of the other and against the first one.
Man as a
totality has not been accepted. This has created misery, anguish, and a
tremendous darkness; a night that has lasted for thousands of years, that seems
to have no end. If you listen to the body, you condemn yourself; if you don't
listen to the body, you suffer -- you are hungry, you are poor, you are
thirsty. If you listen to consciousness only, your growth will be lopsided:
your consciousness will grow but your body will shrink, and the balance will be
lost. And in the balance is your health, in the balance is your wholeness, in
the balance is your joy, your song, your dance.
The West
has chosen to listen to the body, and has become completely deaf as far as the
reality of consciousness is concerned. The ultimate result is great science,
great technology, an affluent society, a richness of things mundane, worldly.
And amidst all this abundance, a poor man without a soul, completely lost --
not knowing who he is, not knowing why he is, feeling almost an accident or a
freak of nature.
Unless
consciousness grows with the richness of the material world, the body -- matter
-- becomes too heavy and the soul becomes too weak. You are too much burdened
by your own inventions, your own discoveries. Rather than creating a beautiful
life for you, they create a life which is felt by all the intelligentsia of the
West as not worth living.
The East
has chosen consciousness and has condemned matter and everything material, the
body included, as maya, as illusory, as a mirage in a desert which only appears
but has no reality in itself. The East has created a Gautam Buddha, a Mahavira,
a Patanjali, a Kabir, a Farid, a Raidas -- a long line of people with great
consciousness, with great awareness. But it has also created millions of poor
people, hungry, starving, dying like dogs -- with not enough food, no pure
water to drink, not enough clothes, not enough shelters.
A strange
situation.... In the West every six months they have to drown billions and
billions of dollars' worth of milk products and other foodstuff in the ocean,
because it is surplus. They don't want to overload their warehouses, they don't
want to lower their prices and destroy their economic structure. On the one
hand, in Ethiopia one thousand people were dying every day, and at the same
time the European Common Market was destroying so much food that the cost of
destroying it was millions of dollars. That is not the cost of the food; it is
the cost of taking it to the ocean, and throwing it into the ocean. Who is
responsible for this situation?
The richest
man in the West is searching for his soul and finding himself hollow, without
any love, only lust; without any prayer, only parrot-like words that he has
been taught in the Sunday schools. He has no religiousness, no feeling for
other human beings, no reverence for life, for birds, for trees, for animals --
destruction is so easy.
Hiroshima
and Nagasaki would not have happened if man were not thought to be just matter.
So many nuclear weapons would not have been piled up if man had been thought to
be a hidden God, a hidden splendor; not to be destroyed but to be discovered,
not to be destroyed but to be brought into the light -- a temple of God. But if
man is just matter, just chemistry, physics, a skeleton covered with skin, then
with death everything dies, nothing remains. That's why it becomes possible for the men to kill million people, without a hitch. If all people are
just matter, there is no question of even thinking twice.
The West
has lost its soul, its interiority. Surrounded by meaninglessness, boredom,
anguish, it is not finding itself. All the success of science is proving of no
use, because the house is full of everything, but the master of the house is
missing. Here, in the East, the master is alive but the house is empty. It is
difficult to rejoice with hungry stomachs, with sick bodies, with death surrounding
you; it is impossible to meditate. So, unnecessarily, we have been losers. All
our saints, and all our philosophers, spiritualists and materialists both, are
responsible for this immense crime against man.
Zorba the
Buddha is the answer. It is the synthesis of matter and soul. It is a
declaration that there is no conflict between matter and consciousness, that we
can be rich on both sides. We can have everything that the world can provide,
that science and technology can produce, and we can still have everything that
a Buddha, a Kabir, a Nanak finds in his inner being -- the flowers of ecstasy,
the fragrance of godliness, the wings of ultimate freedom.
Zorba the
Buddha is the new man, is the rebel. His rebellion consists of destroying the
schizophrenia of man, destroying the dividedness -- destroying spirituality as
against materialism, and destroying materialism as against spirituality. It is
a manifesto that body and soul are together: that existence is full of
spirituality, that even mountains are alive, that even trees are sensitive,
that the whole existence is both -- or perhaps just one energy expressing
itself in two ways, as matter and as consciousness. When energy is purified, it
expresses itself as consciousness; when energy is crude, unpurified, dense, it
appears as matter. But the whole existence is nothing but an energy field.
This is my
experience, it is not my philosophy. And this is supported by modern physics
and its researches: existence is energy. We can allow man to have both the
worlds together. He need not renounce this world to get the other world,
neither has he to deny the other world to enjoy this world. In fact, to have
only one world while you are capable of having both is to be unnecessarily
poor.
Zorba the
Buddha is the richest possibility. He will live his nature to its utmost and he
will sing songs of this earth. He will not betray the earth, and he will not
betray the sky either. He will claim all that this earth has -- all the
flowers, all the pleasures -- and he will also claim all the stars of the sky.
He will claim the whole existence as his home.
The man of
the past was poor because he divided existence. The new man, my rebel, Zorba
the Buddha, claims the whole world as his home. All that it contains is for us,
and we have to use it in every possible way -- without any guilt, without any
conflict, without any choice. Choicelessly enjoy all that matter is capable of,
and rejoice in all that consciousness is capable of.
Be a Zorba,
but don't stop there.
Go on
moving towards being a Buddha.
Zorba is
half, Buddha is half.
There is an
ancient story. In a forest nearby to a city there lived two beggars. Naturally
they were enemies to each other, as all professionals are -- two doctors, two
professors, two saints. One was blind and one was lame, and both were very
competitive; the whole day they were competing with each other in the city.
But one
night their huts caught fire, because the whole forest was on fire. The blind
man could run out, but he could not see where to run, he could not see where
the fire had not yet spread. The lame man could see that there are still
possibilities of getting out of this fire, but he could not run out. The fire
was too fast, wild, so the lame man could only see his death coming. They both
realized that they needed each other. The lame man had a sudden realization,
"The other man can run, the blind man can run, and I can see." They
forgot all their competition. In such a critical moment, when both were facing
death, each necessarily forgot all stupid enmities.
They
created a great synthesis; they agreed that the blind man would carry the lame
man on his shoulders, and they would function as one man -- the lame man could
see, and the blind man could run. They saved their lives. And because they
saved each other's lives they became friends; for the first time they dropped
their antagonism.
Zorba is
blind -- he cannot see, but he can dance, he can sing, he can rejoice. The
Buddha can see, but he can only see. He is pure eyes, just clarity and
perception, but he cannot dance; he is crippled, he cannot sing, he cannot
rejoice.
It is time.
The world is a wildfire; everybody's life is in danger. The meeting of Zorba
and Buddha can save the whole humanity. Their meeting is the only hope. Buddha
can contribute consciousness, clarity, eyes to see beyond, eyes to see that
which is almost invisible. Zorba can give his whole being to Buddha's vision --
and let it not remain just a dry vision, but make it a dancing, rejoicing,
ecstatic way of life.
The
ambassador of Sri Lanka wrote a letter to me saying that I should stop using
the words "Zorba the Buddha"... because Sri Lanka is a Buddhist
country, and he said, "It hurts our religious feelings that you are mixing
strange people, Zorba and Buddha."
I wrote to
him, "Perhaps you don't understand that Buddha is nobody's personal
property, and Buddha is not necessarily the Gautam Buddha who you have been
worshipping for thousands of years in your temples. Buddha simply means `the
awakened one.' It is an adjective; it is not a personal name. Jesus can be
called the buddha; Mahavira was called, in Jaina scriptures, the buddha; Lao
Tzu can be called a buddha -- anybody who is enlightened is a buddha. The word
buddha simply means `the awakened one.'
"Now,
awakening is nobody's property; everybody who can sleep can also awaken. It is
just a natural, logical, corollary -- if you are capable of sleeping, you are
capable of waking up. Zorba is asleep; hence he has the capacity to be awake.
So please don't get unnecessarily enraged, angry. I am not talking about your
Gautam Buddha; I am talking about the pure quality of awakening. I am using it
only as a symbol. "Zorba the Buddha simply means a new name for a new
human being, a new name for a new age, a new name for a new beginning."
He has not
replied. Even people who are holding posts of ambassadors are so utterly
ignorant, so stupid. He thought that he was writing a very significant letter
to me, without even understanding the meaning of the Buddha. Buddha was not the
name of Gautama. His name was Gautam Siddhartha. Buddha was not his name -- the
name given by his parents was Gautam Siddharth. Siddharth was his name, Gautama
was his family name. He is called Buddha because he became awakened; otherwise
he was also a Zorba. Anybody who is not awakened is a Zorba.
Zorba is a
fictitious character, a man who believed in the pleasures of the body, in the
pleasures of the senses. He enjoyed life to the fullest, without bothering
about what is going to happen to him in the next life, whether he will enter
into heaven or be thrown into hell. He was a poor servant; his boss was very
rich, but very serious, long faced -- very British.
One
full-moon night... I have not been able to forget what he said to his boss.
Zorba was in his cabin. He went outside, with his guitar -- he was going to
dance on the beach -- and he invited the boss. He said, "Boss, only one
thing is wrong with you -- you think too much. Just come on! This is not the
time for thinking; the moon is full, and the whole ocean is dancing. Don't miss
this challenge."
He dragged
the boss by his arm. His boss tried not to go with him, because Zorba was
absolutely mad, he used to dance on the beach every night! The boss was feeling
embarrassed.... What if somebody comes and sees that he is also standing with
Zorba? And Zorba was not only inviting his boss to stand by; he was inviting
him to start dancing!
Seeing the
full-moon night and the ocean dancing, and the waves, and Zorba singing with
his guitar, suddenly the boss started feeling an energy in his legs that he had
never felt before. Encouraged and persuaded, he finally joined the dance; at
first reluctantly, glancing all around, but there was nobody on the beach in
the middle of the night. Then he forgot all about the world, and started. He
became one with Zorba the dancer, and the ocean the dancer, and the moon the
dancer. Everything became lost. It all became a dance.
Zorba is a
fictitious character, and Buddha is an adjective for anyone who drops his sleep
and becomes awake. No Buddhist need feel hurt. I am giving Buddha energy to
dance, and I am giving Zorba eyes to see beyond the skies to faraway destinies
of existence and evolution. My rebel is nobody other than Zorba the Buddha.
Source -
Osho Book "The Rebel"
A Quote by
Osho on zorba, buddha, life, happiness, living, experience, monk, world, roots,
and wings
That is the
ultimate synthesis - when Zorba becomes a Buddha. I am trying to create here
not Zorba the Greek but Zorba the Buddha.
Zorba is
beautiful, but something is missing. The earth is his, but the heaven is
missing. He is earthly, rooted, like a giant cedar, but he has no wings. He
cannot fly into the sky. He has roots but no wings.
Eat, drink,
and be merry is perfectly good in itself; nothing is wrong in it. But it is not
enough. Soon you will get tired of it. One cannot just go on eating, drinking,
and merrying. Soon the merry-go-round turns into a sorry-go-round - because it
is repetitive. Only a very mediocre mind can go on being happy with it.
If you have
a little inteligence, sooner or later the question is bound to arise: What is
the point of it all? Why? It is impossible to avoid the question for long. And
if you are very intelligent, it is always there, persistently there, hammering
on your heart for the answer: Give me the answer! - Why?
And one
thing to be remembered: it is not that the people who are poor, starving,
become frustrated with life - no. They cannot become frustrated. They have not
lived yet - how can they be frustrated? They have hopes. A poor man always has
hopes that something is going to happen - if not today then tomorrow, or the
day after tomorrow; if not in this life then in the next life.
What do you
think? Who are these people who have depicted heaven as a playboy Club - who
are these people? Starved, poor, who have missed their life - they are
projecting their desires in heaven. In heaven there are rivers of wine... who
are these people who are imagining rivers of wine? They must have missed here.
And there are wish-fulfilling trees. You sit underneath them, desire, and the
moment you desire, immediately it is fulfilled.
It is only
through experience that one comes to know the utter futility of it all. Only
Zorbas come to know the utter futility of it all. Buddha himself was a Zorba.
He had all the beautiful women available in his country. His father had
arranged for all the beautiful girls to be around him. He had the most
beautiful palaces - different paleces for different seasons. He had all the
luxury that is possible, or that was possible in those days. Helived the life
of a Zorba the Greek - hence, when he was only twenty-nine he become utterly
frustrated. He was a very intelligent man. If he had been a medioce man, then
he would have lived in it. But soon he saw the point: it is repatitive, it is
the same. Every day you eat, every day you make love to a woman... and he had
new women every day to make love to. But how long...? Soon he was fed up.
The
experience of life is very bitter. it is sweet only in imagination. In its
reality it is very bitter. He escaped from the palace and the women and the
riches and the luxury and everything.
So, I am
not against Zorba the Greek because Zorba the Greek is the very foundation of
Zorba the Buddha. Buddha arises out of that experience. So I am all for this
world, because I know the other world can only be experienced through this
world. So I don't say escape from it, I will not say to you to become a monk. A
monk is one who has moved against the Zorba; he is an escapist, a coward; he
has done something in a hurry, out of unintelligence. He is not a mature
person. A monk is immature, greedy - greedy for the other world, and wants it
too early, and the season has not come, and he is not ripe yet.
Live in
this world, because this world gives a ripening, maturity, integrity. The
challenges of this world give you a centering, an awareness. And that awareness
becomes the ladder. Then you can move from Zorba to Buddha.
Only Zorbas become Buddhas - and Buddha was never a monk, A monk is one who has never been a Zorba and has become enchanted by the words of Buddhas. A monk is an imitator, he is false, pseudo. He imitates Buddhas. He may be Christian, he may be Buddhist, he may be a Hindu - that doesn't make much difference - but he imitates Buddhas.
When a monk
goes away from the world, he goes fighting with it. it is not a relaxed going.
His whole being is pulled towards the world. He struggles against it. He
becomes divided. Half of his being is for the world and half has become greedy
for the other. He is torn apart. A monk is basically a schizophrenic, a split
person, divided into the lower and the higher. And the lower goes on pulling
him, and the lower becomes more and more attractive the more it is repressed.
And because he has not lived the lower, he cannot get into the higher.
You can get
into the higher only when you have lived through the lower. You can earn the
higher only by going through all the agony and the ecstasy of the lower. Before
a lotus becomes a lotus it has to move through the mud -- that mud is the
world. The monk has escaped from the mud, he will never become a lotus. It is
as if lotus seed is afraid of falling into mud -- maybe out of ego that,
"I am lotus seed! And I cannot fall into the mud." But then it is
going to remain a seed; it will never bloom as a lotus. If it wants to bloom
like a lotus, it has to fall into the mud; it has to live this contradiction.
Without this contradiction of living in the mud there is no going beyond.
I would
like to you to become rooted into the earth. I am perfectly in agreement with
Friedrich Nietzsche who says: "I beseech you, my brothers, remain faithful
to the earth and do not believe in those who speak of other worldly
hopes!" Learn your first lesson of trust by trusting the earth. It is your
home right now!
Don't
hanker for the other world. Live this world, and live it with intensity, with
passion. Live it with totality, with your whole being. And out of that whole
trust, out of that life of passion, love, and joy, you will become able to go
beyond.
The other
world is hidden in this world. The Buddha is asleep in the Zorba. It has to be
awakened. And nobody can awaken you except life itself.
I am here
to help you to be total wherever you are; in whatsoever state you are - live
that state totally. It is only in living a thing totally that one transcends
it.
First
become a Zorba, a flower of this earth, and earn the capacity through it to
become a Buddha - the flower of the other world. The other world is not away
from this world; the other world is not against this world: the other world is
hidden in this. This is only a manifestataion of the other, and the other is
the unmanifest part of this.
Osho
Zorba
the Buddha - It is my whole philosophia; it is my whole vision in which the lowest
meet with highest, in which materialism and spiritualism will not be two
separate and antagonistic things.
Zorba
the Greek says to his boss, "Boss, everything is right in you , only one
thing is missing -- a little bit of madness!"
And
I agree with Zorba. Sannyas gives you a little bit of madness, but that little
bit of madness brings rainbows to your life...
Sannyas
is a rebellion against both the past and future. Man has either lived in the
past or in the future, but never in the present. And the present is the only
reality there is; nothing else exists. Existence knows only one time, that is
now, and one space, that is here. But mind either lives in the past, which is
no more, or in the future, which is not yet. Mind exists in the
non-existential, hence mind never comes across reality; it cannot be its very
functioning.
Sannyas
is a rebellion against mind itself. It is a way of life in which mind is not
the Master. No-Mind is the master and mind functions only as a servant. Mind is
actually a mechanism, it is good as a beautiful device of nature, but the
moment the servant becomes the master there is danger, great danger. Then your
life is bound to be a mess, a chaos. The servant is blind, unintelligent,
unaware. To live according to the mind is not to live at all, it is sheer
stupidity. Mind is never original, never intelligent; it is always repetitive,
it is always borrowed, it is always mechanical-- hence stupid, hence unintelligent.
Sannyas
is a tremendous jump into reality, an escape to reality from the unreal.
Sannyas
is to give you a seance of direction, a togetherness, a rootedness, an
awareness of what you are and what you can be.
My
effort here is to make thousands of Buddhas. Less than that won't do.
Sannyas
is just a beginning, a seed of a totally different kind of world where people
are free to be themselves, where people are not constrained, crippled,
paralyzed, where people are not repressed, made to feel guilty, where joy is
accepted, where cheerfulness is the rule, where seriousness has disappeared,
where a non-serious sincerity, a playfulness has entered. These can be the
indications, the fingers pointing to the moon.
First:
an openness to experience.
The
second quality is existential living. Existential living means each moment has
to decide on its own.
The
third quality of a sannyasin is a trust in one's own organism.
The
fourth is a sense of freedom. A sannyasin is immensely respectful about his own
freedom, very careful about his own freedom, and so is he about others' freedom
too.
The fifth
is creativity. My conception of a sannyasin is that his energy will be
creative, that he will bring a little more beauty into the world, that he will
bring a little more joy into the world, that he will find new ways to get into
dance, singing, music, that he will bring some beautiful poems. He will create
something, he will not be uncreative.
The sixth
is a sense of humour, laughter, playfulness, no serious sincerity.
The seventh
is meditativeness, aloneness, mystical peak experiences that happen when you
are alone, when you are absolutely alone inside yourself.
Sannyas
makes you alone; not lonely, but alone; not solitary, but it gives you a
solitude. You can be happy alone, you are no longer dependent on others. You
can sit alone in your room and you can be utterly happy.
And
the eighth is love, relatedness, relationship. Remember, you can relate only
when you have learned how to be alone, never before it. Only two individuals
can relate. Only two freedoms can come close and embrace each other. And only
two nothingnesses can penetrate into each other and melt into each other.
And
the ninth is transcendence, Tao-- not ego: no-mind, nobodiness, nothingness, in
tune with the whole.
ONE
THING IS absolutely certain: The days of the politicians are over. They have
done too well their job of being destructive, violent. Nothing is favorable to
the politician; and as each day passes his death comes closer. He himself is
responsible. He improved the weapons, which can bring death to the whole world,
to such a point that there is no way to going back. Either there will be
ultimate war -- which means death to all and everything -- or a total change of
the whole structure in the human society. I am calling that change
"meritocracy".
One
thing -- we have to drop the idea that every man, just because he is
twenty-one, is capable of choosing who is the right person to decide the fate
of nations. Age cannot be a decisive factor. We have to change the decisive
factor, that is changing the very foundation.
My
suggestion is that only a person who is at least a matriculate, a high school
graduate, will be able to vote. His age does not matter.
For
the local government, matriculation will be the qualification for the voters.
And graduation from a university, at least a bachelor's degree, should be a
necessary qualification for election, for the candidates. A master's degree
should be a minimum qualification for the one who is running for mayor.
For
the state elections, graduation with a bachelor's degree should be the minimum
qualification for the voters. A master's degree in science. the arts, commerce,
should be the necessary degree for the candidates. For the cabinet ministers an
M.A. with highest honors should be the minimum necessary qualification; more
will be, of course. more appreciated. And anybody trying to become a cabinet
minister will have to know something about the subject. His qualification
should correspond to the subject matter that he is going to deal with in his
term of office.
So
if somebody is going to be an education minister, then his qualification should
make him capable of being an education minister. He should have at least a master's
degree in education with highest honors; with less than highest honors nobody
should be a minister on the state level. Yes if he has better degrees -- doctor
of education, Ph. D. in education -- that is good, that will make him more
qualified.
The
attorney general should have at least a doctorate in law, an LL.D. -- not less
than that, because he is going to going to defend the law of the state, the
right of the citizens. He should have the best degree possible so he knows
everything about it.
The
governor should have the best of all the degrees possible for him: M.A. with
highest honors, Ph. D. -- his Ph. d. should be political science -- and at
least one honorary degree, a D. Litt. or LL.D.
For
the federal government, a master's degree will be the voter's minimum
qualification. A master's degree with highest honors and a Ph.D. should be the
minimum for the candidates running for election. And the ministers should all
have the highest degrees in the subjects for which they are going to be
ministers. If it is education then the highest degrees in education available
in the country; if it is going to be health, then the highest degrees in health
available in the country.
The
president should have at least too Ph.D.s and one honorary D.Litt. or LL.D; and
the same for the vice-president because he can become president any day.
In
this way mobocracy is destroyed.
Then
just because your are twenty-one it does not mean you are capable of choosing
the government. Choosing the government should be very skillful, intelligent
job. Just by being twenty-one you may be able to reproduce children - it needs
no skill, no education, biology sends you well prepared. But to choose the
government, to choose people who are going to have all the powers over you and
everybody, and who are going to decide the destiny of the country and the
world, just to be twenty- one is certainly not enough . . . the way we have
been choosing them is simply idiotic.
I
would like all the universities - within each state - to call a convention of
all the Vice chancellors and the eminent professors; of the eminent
intelligentsia who may not be part of the university: painters, artists, poets,
writers, novelists, dancers, actors, musicians. It would include all dimensions
of talents, all kinds of people who have shown their caliber - excluding
politicians completely.
All
the Nobel Prize winners should be invited - excluding the politicians again,
because within these past few years a few politicians have been given Nobel
Prizes, and this has degraded the value the Nobel Prize.
So
from each state a delegation should be chosen for the national convention,
which goes into details of how the meritocracy can work.
From
the national candidates there should be an international convention of all the
universities of the world and the intelligentsia. This would be the first of
its kind because never has be whole intelligentsia of the world come together
to decide the fate of humanity.
They
should write the first constitution of the world. It will not be American, it
will not be Indian, it will not be Chinese -- it is going to be simply be
constitution of the whole of humanity. There is no need for different kinds of
laws. There is no need - all human beings need the same kind of laws.
And
a world constitution will be a declaration that nations are no longer
significant. They can exist as functional units but they are no longer
independent powers. And if the whole intelligentsia of the world is behind this
convention it will not be very difficult to convince the generals of the world
to move away from the politicians.
And
what power do politicians have? All the power that they have we have given to
them. We can take it back. It is not their power, it is our power. We just have
to find a way to take it back -- because giving is very easy, taking is little
difficult. They will not be so simple and innocent when you take the power back
as they were when they were asking it from you. It is our power, but they will
go on having it if the mob remains there to give it to them; the mob can be
convinced about anything.
It
is the function of the intelligentsia . . . I would like to say that now, if
anything happens to humanity, the whole condemnation will go to the
intelligentsia: "What were you doing? If those idiots were ready to kill
humanity, what were you doing? You simply went on grumbling, being grumpy, but
you did nothing else".
And
the time is running short. Once we decide that the voting power is not the
birthright of every human being but is a right which you will have to earn by
your intelligence . . . You have to see the distinction: Everybody is given the
opportunity to earn it, there is equal opportunity for all to earn it, but it
is nothing birth-given; you have to prove it.
Once
we move the power from the mob into the hands of intelligent people, people who
know what they doing, we can create something beautiful.
If
a man who has devoted his whole life to think about education and its problems,
has done all that was possible to do to find out every detail, every
fundamental of education, all the possible philosophies of education -- if he
becomes an education minister, there is a possibility that he will do
something.
I
suggest to shift completely from the mob to the chosen few.
I
am not against the people. In fact, in the hands of these politicians, the
people are against themselves. I am all for the people, and what I am saying
can be said to be exactly what has been said about democracy: for the people,
by the people, of the people -- just "by the people". I will have to
change. This intelligentsia will be for the people, of the people. It will be
serving the masses.
It
is so simple a thing. You don't elect a doctor, and just anybody can stand,
because it is a birthright and people can vote . . . to persons fighting to be
the doctor or to be the surgeon. What is wrong in it? The people choose for
themselves: for the people, by the people, of the people. They choose one
person -- to be surgeon -- because he speaks better, he looks good on the
television and he makes great promises.
But
he is not even a butcher, and he is going to become a surgeon! A butcher would
have been better; at least he would known how to cut -- but you don't choose a
surgeon by election.
How
can you choose a president by election? How can you choose a governor by
election? For one post so many people are hankering, desiring. Those who are
more sick with ambitiousness will fight the most, they will kill -- they will
do anything.
You
are giving so much power to power-hungry people; with your own hands you are
helping them to hang you!
This
is not democracy.
In
the name of democracy these people have been exploiting the masses.
So
politicians and priests both have to be dropped out of their long,
long-standing establishment, and a totally new kind of management has to be
developed.
Just
to make distinction I am calling my system "meritocracy". But merit
for what? The merit is to serve and share. And once you have decided to shift
the power from the politicians to the intelligentsia, everything is possible --
everything becomes simple.
Meritocracy
is a whole program of transforming the structure of society, the structure of
the government, the structure of education.
Zorba the Buddha the Creation of the New Man on Earth
Osho the Zouddha
MORE: http://delfeios.blogspot.gr/2014/03/blog-post_16.html
"Milarepa, you hear my music; that music comes from the beyond. I cannot claim any monopoly, any copyright on it."
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήOSHO